Let me start by saying ... My dogs are not perfect either (thank God, 'cause life would be boring). I was just thinking out loud when I questioned the lists of people in general, not yours specificly
. I don't put an item on the list when they don't know it like I want them to know it. And yes, I'm a bit of a freak.
I do think that a day of non-training can help a dog to clear his mind and work faster/more focused the next session. Here we have play days in between, long walk days (+15km walks), ... But I 'm talking about 1 or 2 days MAX/week. All the other days it's walking, playing and training.
Orpheum, your english IS magnificent, not sure that last line will easily translate, i mean to say, i think tricks training, by any method, that is the LEARNING and interaction itself, which sharpens a dogs mind.
YES, we can almost agree on something
. I always say to "my" students that trick training helps to get a better bond with their dog. And a lot of times they end up saying after a few lessons "I did not know my dog could think like that". That's where I bring up this line again.
You sharpen a dogs mind, but you will also see and understand how your dog thinks. In the end it's not about the amount of tricks a dog can do, but the way you explain these tricks to YOUR dog. Clear communication will help your dog and stimulate him to think in the same line as you are.
But ... are we only stimulating our dog's mind, or do we force ourselves to look at our dog differently? We say that our dogs become smarter, but isn't our human way of thinking making place for a doggy way of thinking? Dogs can survive on their own. They are "street smart" and every dog can teach himself a behaviour that's so strong you'll go crazy when you want to stop this behaviour (leash barking, territorial behaviour problems, trying to speed up training to get more treats faster, ...). Most of the time the dog is outsmarting the human in these cases, even though we don't like to admit it being the "superior species" (that's why people have developed dominance theories in my opinion
) .
In my classes I rarely see a dog becoming "oh so smart", but owners becoming better communicators with their dogs.
//After that I start tossing the treats in a very specific direction. By repositioning my reward line (where the treat is going) I build up a weave.//
Is this luring then?
This could be considered luring (but I never call it luring). I'm rewarding the dog by pulling him out of his position in a certain way. I click for the dog to go through my legs (no luring), I program the muscles for the next step by maintaining a well defined reward line. The main idea I got from the "2by2 weave pole training" DVD from Susan Garett. Look it up and you'll see it's not realy luring.
I also often train my dogs by clicking for a behaviour and rewarding them out of position. But I'm actualy setting them back up for succes. Like in this clip. This is'nt luring, allthough people could consider it like that.
BUT once again. I'm not a term freak, luring shaping etc. If it works and it doesn't stress a dog it's good, no matter what it's called.